Risk Management Toolkit

Support Assets

Taxonomies

Risk Areas:
Management

Risk Management home

Risk Areas' page

Process Assets
Standard Process
  • Definitions
  • Steps of Process
  • Tailoring Guidelines

    Compliance

  • Self Assessment
  • Compliance Process
  • CMMI Risk Management Goals
  • Risk Review

    Policy

  • AF Policy Directive 90-9: Operational Risk Management, 1 April 2000
  • AFI 90-901: Operational Risk Management, 1 April 2000
  • AFMC Instruction 90-902: Operational Risk Management, Dec 2007

    Support Assets
    Procedures

  • Affinity Diagrams
  • Brainstorming
  • Risk Plotting
  • Risk Statements

    Taxonomies

  • Individual
  • Consolidated
  • Risk Areas

  • Tools & Techniques

  • RiskNav
  • Risk Matrix
  • Risk Radar

    Training

  • Risk Process Orientation
  • Detailed Risk Process
  • Facilitator Training

    Examples

  • Sample Risk Management Plan
  • Process Lessons Learned

  •   

    Description:
    The capability to plan, resource, control, and monitor the effort.

    Risks:

    • Does the program have documented management processes or controls?

    • Does the program manager have management and leadership experience?

    • Does the program manager have management and leadership training?

    • Is the program manager position changing frequently?

    • Are program budget, cost, and/or schedule fixed for reasonable durations?

    • Are program budget, cost, and/or schedule political issues?

    • Are parallel or evolutionary developments handled effectively?

    • Is the program management centralized (single location for PM and PCO)?

    • Is the program plan feasible?

    • Is the program manager able to meet with senior decision-makers for program decisions when needed?

    • Does the program manager understand the priorities of the stakeholders?

    • Are the administrative reporting requirements reasonable?

    • Are the resources assigned to the program office sufficient to handle the program workload?

    • Are the government and support contractor resources assigned to the program sufficient to handle the program workload?

    • Do requests for additional information require additional funding?

    • Are all stakeholders known?

    • Are other programs evaluating this program for possible development opportunities?

    • Is the program priority sufficient to get necessary personnel, equipment, and facilities?

    • Is the proper mix (experience, skills, stability) of people assigned to the program or contractor team?

    • Are effective risk assessments performed?
      • Are the results understood?
      • Are the results acted upon?

    • Does the program management team have a commitment to delivering a quality product?


    Back to top



    For questions or comments regarding this Web site, please contact our Web Team.
    Last modified: Wednesday, April 2, 2003