Risk Management Toolkit

Support Assets

Taxonomies

Risk Areas:
Survivability

Risk Management home

Risk Areas' page

Process Assets
Standard Process
  • Definitions
  • Steps of Process
  • Tailoring Guidelines

    Compliance

  • Self Assessment
  • Compliance Process
  • CMMI Risk Management Goals
  • Risk Review

    Policy

  • AF Policy Directive 90-9: Operational Risk Management, 1 April 2000
  • AFI 90-901: Operational Risk Management, 1 April 2000
  • AFMC Instruction 90-902: Operational Risk Management, Dec 2007

    Support Assets
    Procedures

  • Affinity Diagrams
  • Brainstorming
  • Risk Plotting
  • Risk Statements

    Taxonomies

  • Individual
  • Consolidated
  • Risk Areas

  • Tools & Techniques

  • RiskNav
  • Risk Matrix
  • Risk Radar

    Training

  • Risk Process Orientation
  • Detailed Risk Process
  • Facilitator Training

    Examples

  • Sample Risk Management Plan
  • Process Lessons Learned

  •   

    Description:
    The capability of a system and its crew to avoid or withstand a man-made hostile environment without suffering an abortive impairment of its ability to accomplish its designated mission.

    Risks:

    • Is there uncertainty in threat accuracy?

    • Is the design or technology sensitive to threat?

    • Is the design or technology sensitive to threat countermeasures?

    • Is the design or technology vulnerable to intelligence penetration?

    • Is the system able to prevent engagement by allied systems in a fratricidal incident?

    • Is the system able to support correct identification of U.S. or allied systems, which might otherwise be engaged in a fratricidal incident?

    • Does the system have support for crew training and readiness to reduce the probability of a fratricidal event?

    • Do the system's weapons design characteristics reduce the probability of committing fratricide?

    • Does the system's physical signature affect the system's detectability by threat forces?

    • Do the system's operational characteristics affect the system's detectability by threat forces?

    • Does the system appear as a high value target?

    • Does the system actively prevent or deter attack?

    • Does the system's concept of employment consider/include system survivability?

    • Is the system able to minimize the risk to supporting personnel if attacked?

    • Is the system able to protect the crew from attacking weapons?

    • What are the system's potential sources of injury to the crew, or the supported troops, affected by the fielding of this system?

    • Is the system able to protect the crew from hazards relating to on-board equipment (fuel, munitions, etc.) in the event of an attack?

    • Is the system able to prevent further injury to the soldier after being attacked?

    • Is the system able to support treatment and evacuation of injured soldiers?

    • Do the physical constraints and workload placed on the soldier by the system increase or contribute to physical and mental fatigue?

    • Do the cognitive constraints and workload placed on the soldier increase or contribute to physical and mental fatigue?

    • Is the system able to minimize the effect of environmental stressors on the soldier?

    • Is the system able to minimize the effect of physical and environmental stressors (e.g. noise, vibrations, bouncing, and extreme heat or cold) on the soldier?

    • Does the system promote unit/team cohesion?


    Back to top